Meeting Intelligence reads the write-ups from your note-taking tool, works out whether the meeting was internal, with a client or with a prospect, and files it in the right folder. With the reasoning attached, so you can see why.
No sales track: half an hour tells you what it does with your meetings.
"The AI sorts, and when it is unsure a human decides. That order is fixed, and you set where the line sits." The premise behind Meeting Intelligence
A model that is occasionally wrong is fine, as long as it tells you when it is unsure. That is what this is built around.
How sure has it been these past weeks, and how often did you have to correct it? Without those numbers you cannot tell whether to trust it.
Want more of it passing a human first? Move the threshold up. It applies straight away, without anyone having to ship a release.
Unless the system hesitates. Then it is your turn, and that is exactly the point.
Your note-taking tool, Fireflies for instance, delivers the write-up as soon as the meeting ends. Nobody has to upload a thing.
Internal, client or prospect, based on the participants and the content. With a score for how sure it is and an explanation of why.
Sure enough: straight into the right folder. Unsure: into the review queue, with the flags that explain the doubt.
A write-up that belongs nowhere is a write-up you will not find again in six months. Once every meeting sits with the right client, "what did we agree again" is a question with an answer.
Note-taking tools write perfectly good summaries. It goes wrong in what happens to them afterwards, or rather what does not.
The agreement is in a write-up. Which one, nobody remembers. So it gets discussed all over again.
Internal stand-ups, client calls and first conversations sit side by side. Anyone after one client's history scrolls forever.
Whoever takes over an account starts from nothing, while the history is right there. Just not anywhere you can find it.
No proposal process up front. We show it and start from your situation.
Online, with someone who built it. Not a salesperson who has to look up the answer.
Rather email first? [email protected]
From the note-taking tool you already use, Fireflies for example. As soon as a write-up is ready there, it arrives through a webhook and goes through categorisation. Nobody has to upload anything.
The meeting goes to the review queue instead of into a folder. Per meeting you see why it hesitated, for instance mixed email domains or a participant it has not seen before. You approve or correct the category. Below the lowest threshold a human decision is mandatory and an alert goes to Slack.
Yes. Corrections go back into the prompt as examples, so comparable meetings go better afterwards. You set how many examples travel along, and setting it to zero turns the feedback loop off entirely.
In your own vaults, with a separate folder per category. Clients and prospects each get their own folder. Low-confidence meetings go to the triage vault so they do not end up among the approved material.
Yes. High, medium and low are yours to set, as is the maximum confidence when participant signals are weak. It is runtime configuration: you change it and it applies immediately, without a release.
Failed events stay visible in the webhook queue, with the number of attempts and the last error message. You can see when something got stuck, rather than a meeting quietly disappearing.
That depends on your volume and on what your archive looks like. In the demo we walk through your situation and you get a concrete proposal afterwards.
An online demo with someone who built it. You will also hear when it is not right for you.
Book a demo